Emil O W Kirkegaard

Scholars certainly disagree with him. That’s a far cry from asserting that he was a racist or didn’t know what he was talking about.

He was a racist and on racial differences he didn’t know what he was talking about. It was enough to be an entire chapter in his tributed book edited by fucking Nyborg.

You use that word very casually. People who actually know the literature, say James Flynn, praised Jensen profusely and claimed he was a gentleman without a scintilla of racial bias. Possibly, you should actually read the literature first.

The interchanges between James Flynn and Arthur Jensen should be taught in philosophy of science courses as a model for scientist behavior.

Interesting to come across this thread. Was in another seemingly intractable discussion with this same individual on Rushton. Thread on LH.

Rushton was much worse than Jensen, tho

I am doing my due diligence to make up my own mind as I am not aware of the full scope of accusations, evidence, and truth. Rushton had his defenders too.