The Zietsch and Sidari critique of applications of life history theory to humans is published in @EvolHumBehav . Some responses forthcoming. Things getting interesting.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513818302848 …
-
-
Replying to @GRich_Cinci @EvolHumBehav
Interesting indeed. Any idea who is writing responses?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
I have some thoughts...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I mean, it’s not something I know a great deal about, but I think it’s a great article.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I really like it to, much needed. r/K is popular among some groups and has some nasty ties to people like J. Philippe Rushton
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I’m not seeing many papers invoking r/K anymore. Seems like Rushton keeps coming up tho. Has anyone tried to get retractions of his papers? New people who are curious about pop differences will continue to find them. As I recall, the Charleston shooter found that stuff...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
r/K is out of fashion but some LHT stuff is hard to distinguish the way some authors frame I t (definitely not all). I imagine retracting Rushton’s stuff will be hard, which is a shame
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Not nearly as hard as getting retractions on papers by wansink or Sternberg. These are ideas people mostly dislike rather than like, and Rushton isn’t a leader in a field.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GRich_Cinci @itsbirdemic and
Don’t
@sTeamTraen and@jamesheathers do this kind of work for free?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GRich_Cinci @itsbirdemic and
Out of the loop here. What's the story?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @jamesheathers @GRich_Cinci and
SJWs trying to get some papers they don't like retracted. 
7:19 AM - 23 Jul 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.