Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
KirkegaardEmil's profile
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
@KirkegaardEmil

Tweets

Emil O W Kirkegaard

@KirkegaardEmil

#psychology #genomics #hbd #rstats #statistics #genomics #transhumanism #dataviz #openscience #psychometrics @OpenPsychJour

Denmark
emilkirkegaard.dk
Joined January 2012

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Jon Tennant‏Verified account @Protohedgehog Jul 15
      • Report Tweet

      Reminder: Access to scientific knowledge is a fundamental human right, encoded in the UN Declaration of Human Rights Paywalls from commercial publishers like SpringerNature, Elsevier, and Wiley violate these rights. Your rights. Open Access is a social justice issue.

      12 replies 221 retweets 568 likes
    2. Gavin Yamey‏ @GYamey Jul 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @Protohedgehog @openscience

      Yes! At the risk of being self promotional (sorry), I wrote a paper analyzing access to biomedical knowledge through a human rights lens. “Excluding the poor from accessing the biomedical literature: a rights violation that impedes global health,” at https://cdn2.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/125/2013/07/4-Yamey.pdf …

      4 replies 2 retweets 10 likes
    3. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Jul 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @GYamey @Protohedgehog @openscience

      These people aren't going to be reading the medical literature anyway. Low knowledge is a demand problem, not supply.

      2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes
    4. Jon Tennant‏Verified account @Protohedgehog Jul 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @GYamey @openscience

      Sorry, but this is plain wrong. People do want to read the medical literature. Small example: https://whoneedsaccess.org/  And you're conflating the 'lack of demand' with the right to deny access too. People should have the right to read what they want, should they choose to.

      1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
    5. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Jul 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @Protohedgehog @GYamey @openscience

      It's not plain wrong, dude. Internet made most knowledge free, and there is no notable change in how much stuff people know in general. Demand problem, not supply problem. Normal people can't understand medical literature. Open access is not going to help them much.

      2 replies 1 retweet 22 likes
    6. Jon Tennant‏Verified account @Protohedgehog Jul 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @GYamey @openscience

      If the internet made most knowledge free, then why is around 75% of all scholarly research still behind private paywalls? And saying normal people don't understand the med lit is generally offensive (and wrong), and again not an excuse to deny them the right to access.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Jul 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @Protohedgehog @GYamey @openscience

      Wikipedia has been around for years, but general knowledge does not increase. Most scholarly works have been fairly available for years sing Scihub. Millions of nonfiction books available via libraries and Libgen for years. See the pattern? Increase supply, no change in Y.

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    8. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Jul 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @Protohedgehog and

      No need to attack strawman. I am an #openaccess advocate, but I don't like these bad arguments for open access as some kind of solution to public ignorance. The public is ignorant because they rather watch television than read science etc. There is nothing you can do about that.

      1 reply 3 retweets 14 likes
    9. Jon Tennant‏Verified account @Protohedgehog Jul 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @GYamey @openscience

      Erm. There is no strawman, except from you here. At no point did I say it's a solution to public ignorance. You did, and then made several dubious, probably offensive, and unrelated remarks to the original tweet. Check, seriously. And carefully.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil Jul 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @Protohedgehog @GYamey @openscience

      Most people don't want to read it, and they don't read it when it is made available. Making it more available will change just about nothing in public ignorance or utility of medical literature. I don't understand how much more clear it can be said. OA helps mostly academics.

      6:47 AM - 16 Jul 2019
      • 4 Likes
      • Gordon Hanzmann James Miller insilications Mateus Roger
      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Jon Tennant‏Verified account @Protohedgehog Jul 16
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @GYamey @openscience

          Please read the paper that Gavin kindly shared earlier on in this thread before continuing to engage further with this discussion. Personally, I think your views here are among some of the most damaging from the world of academia at the moment.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Xirui Zhao‏ @xirui_zhao Jul 18
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @Protohedgehog @KirkegaardEmil and

          You have unreasonable expectations of the capability and aspirations of ordinary people. They have their own lives and just want the best yet least expensive treatments and don’t care to know the details of medicine, unless they’re curious.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info