If you had listened to the "brainlets" on twitter and done decent science you wouldn't have published something that bad
-
-
Replying to @itsbirdemic @AdamRutherford and
Do you wanna bet that future genomics studies will vindicate us? Ashkenazim intelligence is higher for mostly genetic reasons. Probably someone will publish mixed-ethnic GWAS for EA/IQ within a few years, so it should have equal validity, so we will know.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @AdamRutherford and
Oh sure, the magic evidence is always just around the corner, isn't it?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BakerFlan @itsbirdemic and
There isn't plenty of evidence, the entire reductionist/additive genetic model used for it is not even validated. Not one ounce of causal architecture for between group variance in intelligence nor even things like height have been validated to work that way Not even the top hits
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BakerFlan @itsbirdemic and
Its not a demand, it is pointing out facts. There is no consensus on any part being genetically innate for those reasons. Also its not merely that there isn't molecular causal evidence it is that the fundamental model its based on has failed to be validated.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @BakerFlan @itsbirdemic and
Funny thing is that all this "people noticing" hasn't lead to causal architecture. Something supposedly so obvious and not even a shred of causal evidence that one can get a consensus from... and this is decades after the human genome project was completed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Use mute/block, dude.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.