Is Gender Bias in Scientific Peer Review Fake News? Thread: Preliminary Evidence on the Canonization of Bullshit Rhetorical claims of Gender Bias in Science, including (tho not restricted) to peer review are everywhere. I focus here on peer review. 1/n ending in END.
-
Show this thread
-
Claims of Gender Bias in Physics:https://www.particlesforjustice.org/
2 replies 11 retweets 48 likesShow this thread -
Celeste blocked me, but you can find her thread on the biases faced by women in science here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1117160602416316417.html …
3 replies 9 retweets 50 likesShow this thread -
Lee Jussim Retweeted Sanjay Srivastava
More claims of gender bias here (see also the tweet it retweets):https://twitter.com/hardsci/status/1116521914548146176 …
Lee Jussim added,
1 reply 8 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
In this blog I review the empirically unjustified claims made about "implicit" gender biases in science at a prestigious conference:https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201707/gender-bias-in-science-or-biased-claims-gender-bias …
1 reply 12 retweets 60 likesShow this thread -
I continued my discussion of those empircal-claims-that-lacked-empirical-evidence of gender bias here:https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201707/gender-bias-in-science …
2 replies 9 retweets 54 likesShow this thread -
So the rhetoric of "OMG LOOK AT ALL THE GENDER BIAS IN SCIENCE!" is wide and deep. I then tracked down every study of such biases in peer review (publication, funding, hiring) that I could find.
2 replies 11 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
I am open to updating it, but I report here: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201906/are-scientists-biased-against-women-scientists-part-ii … what I found:pic.twitter.com/iHi4nGPrrv
2 replies 21 retweets 93 likesShow this thread -
So where is all the OMG LOOK AT GENDER BIAS IN SCIENCE! rhetoric coming from? I started looking at citations. Moss-Racusin et al found bias favoring men. Williams & Ceci found bias favoring women. AFTER W&C was published, hundreds of articles cited M-R w/o citing W&C.pic.twitter.com/Pbzz0ZCtET
1 reply 21 retweets 106 likesShow this thread -
Same pattern here, for older research. Bias against women? Massive cited. Bias favoring women? All-but-ignored.pic.twitter.com/BR47M3KmZb
3 replies 31 retweets 168 likesShow this thread
Why don't you do regressions for these? You can add the stereotype accuracy studies to the collection and code each study as being PC friendly or not. @ImHardcory territory
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.