2. I am an immigration restrictionist in the Rich Lowry sense of the word. But, I am not dogmatic about this, and I would happily discuss. I might change my mind. 3. I am pro choice and pro gay marriage and pro socially tolerant policies in general
-
-
Replying to @EPoe187 @mariachong and
4. I think it quite likely that both genes and environment play a role in differences in cognitive abilities among population groups, but I think that we should treat people as individuals, so I don't think this has any necessary policy consequences
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @EPoe187 @mariachong and
5. I am not a fan of ethnonationalism, although I can understand the impulse. I'm ultimately a cosmpolitan. I like diverse intellectual ideas and influences. And I treat and see people as individuals. And I would urge others to do the same.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @EPoe187 @mariachong and
6. I am opposed to affirmative action for a variety of reasons, but I'm also not dogmatic about this. I am willing to listen to arguments. I don't have super strong beliefs here. 7. I am not a fan of, say, David Duke. I find his divisive rhetoric odious and unproductive.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @EPoe187 @mariachong and
8. I think that it is better to discourse with and debate most people. 9.I am not easily offended. I like Emil Kirkegaard, even though I don't personally like everything he has said or written.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @EPoe187 @mariachong and
10. I generally don't share the political beliefs of conservatives, because I am too liberal on a number of issues, but I don't like progressivism either. So I float around somewhere in the center.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @EPoe187 @mariachong and
11. I think free speech and free inquiry are absolutely crucial, and we should strive to protect them as vigorously as we can.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @EPoe187 @itsbirdemic and
Thank you. Do you find the race beliefs of OpenPsych and MQ reprehensible?
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @mariachong @itsbirdemic and
I honestly don't know what those beliefs are. Noah Carl wrote a piece that I fully endorse in OpenPsych. I would submit to OpenPsyche. But I probably don't share most of their political preferences.
4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @EPoe187 @mariachong and
Emil O W Kirkegaard Retweeted Emil O W Kirkegaard
How do you know though? I mean, no one has done a survey of OP or MQ people, so no one really knows. When I've done surveys of our various private fora, these always come out as mixed, basically dead center on average (using Nolan chart approach).https://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/1033957215001096192 …
Emil O W Kirkegaard added,
Emil O W Kirkegaard @KirkegaardEmilMy information bubble (private discussion forum), at least in so far as the 10 item Nolan test is concerned. Average is close to 50 on both scales with sd's of about 30, so it's quite mixed. Post with my political quiz results from a variety of tests. http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=7325 pic.twitter.com/dmtwEq6hao1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
You should stop letting her play the dissociation game with you. You cannot win by bad mouthing Pioneer Fund or Richard Spencer etc. They will always hate you because they hate reality of group differences, no matter your personal virtues.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.