The lesson was I was right all along? Funny that’s the lesson most people take from criticism.
-
-
He is correct, though. It is simply a *fact*, that the vast majority of negative criticism has just been hysterical non-empirical reactions. I also told Bo that he should've predicted the reaction. But that's because he should have known that's what people are like.
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Well I won’t disagree with the fact that people react emotionally and tribally but I don’t think that negates all the relevant issues. Bo himself already acknowledged including this reference was a mistake and it’s particularly not good because the conclusion of the cited...
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @Scientific_Bird and
... article, regardless of skull measurement, runs pretty counter to Bo and Carl’s position.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
I don't know what "all the relevant issues" are. I am totally fine with people critiquing Bo and Noah's article. I just prefer that this is done in a calm and collected manner, where the empirical claims are at the center of the discussion.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @Scientific_Bird @C_Kavanagh and
This makes it much easier (for me and others) to assess where they are wrong, where they lack nuance, and where they are correct. Also, Bo acknowledged including it was a mistake. But his admitted fault is a tactical one, not an empirical one.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Not sure that is true, given his exchange with
@Evolving_Moloch, maybe he could clarify.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C_Kavanagh @EPoe187 and
Let me clarify: It was a tactical mistake because the vast majority of the reaction to the "skulls" were emotional, not empirical. It is possible that they should have added more nuance for empirical reasons, but most of the reactions weren't due to empirical reasons.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @Scientific_Bird @C_Kavanagh and
I think one problem with your principle is that it allows dishonest people to control debates. I don’t like that. But I understand your point.
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @EPoe187 @Scientific_Bird and
Let’s not forget that liberals like Franz Boas measured skulls too, to show that 2nd generation children of immigrants did not differ from native WASPs like the immigrant generation - thereby countering racist arguments. Shouting without evidence convinces no one.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
They did, but they did it wrong. In their defense, stats knowledge was very bad in that time, but the uncritical acceptance of this finding later is less excusable. (A similar case is that of Wissler's reaction time study.)https://www.pnas.org/content/99/23/14636 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.