Mmmm, wwwwhat?! As an Academic Editor of PLOS One, this is the first news I have. Blended feelings right now :/
-
-
-
It's a sarcastic comment on critics attacking
@OpenPsychJour for not having peer review based on the publicness of the reviews. Of course, I think open reviews are a good idea for science, and wholly in line with#openscience movement goals. -
I've got it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.