The newspaper features the usual components: 1) supposed consensus against hereditarianism based on no data, 2) no actual hereditarian giving their side, 2) Flynn effect, 3) gap narrowings, 4) large SES Scarr-Rowe claims, 5) irrelevant milk chugging alt-righters. And Nisbett
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Twin studies have shown that in children growing up with low social and economic status, the environment can explain about 60 percent of the variations in their IQ, whereas heredity virtually cannot explain." So does that imply the other 40% is heredity?
-
It's not real. Turkheimer's wild claim did not replicate. After all, it's a GxE claim and these usually are not real, or very tiny. http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=6271
-
Your images are broken for your latest post https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/ pic.twitter.com/ZpQ15d3vyr
-
Doing a restore from backup.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.