A version of "The difference between statistically-significant and not statistically-significant is not statistically-significant."
Nice summary of the 'new statistics' of moderate frequentism based on confidence intervals and effect sizes. We can't really teach much better, but we can use an approach more resistant to human errors. Still haven't seen good RCTs though. https://thenewstatistics.com/itns/2019/05/20/reply-to-lakens-the-correctly-used-p-value-needs-an-effect-size-and-ci/ …pic.twitter.com/h6skcnIqam
-
-
-
Shorter: Interaction testing must be explicit. Imperative: test interactions explicitly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“Moderate frequentism“
-
Wouldn't want to be associated with those extreme frequentists!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.