Obviously, researchers think heritability is meaningful, otherwise they wouldn't bother with all the studies. The philosophers are out of touch with the science. Note that philosophers are very left-wing so we can expect them to dislike heritability for political reasons alone.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
I completely disagree. I think it is much more productive to just get more scientific findings out. The issue can be solved with genomics is very near future, I don't think philosophy has much to contribute here. Tbh, I do not care very much what philosophers think of the topic.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Philosophers are not going to change their minds no matter what I do. Their beliefs stem mostly from politics, not science. However, empirical evidence can convince scientists and if clean enough, normal people. I think that's the more likely pathway to acceptance.
-
No one else reads these philosophy debates, so they are basically irrelevant except for philosophers themselves and a small minority of philosophy interested people and critics. Hence, instrumentally speaking, there is little reason to engage with them.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.