I don't like literature based expressions because these are sensitive to social desirability bias, whereas anonymous surveys are not so much. I think one should follow the approach used in climate science to gauge expert opinion on climate change. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I haven't read his book yet, so maybe I just don't understand what it is he's arguing from your summary. I am disinclined to spend much time on philosophy myself since I think it detracts from much more important science. Sesardic, Cofnas et al will probably engage. I'll ask.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I completely disagree. I think it is much more productive to just get more scientific findings out. The issue can be solved with genomics is very near future, I don't think philosophy has much to contribute here. Tbh, I do not care very much what philosophers think of the topic.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.