But there is no consensus against race and IQ hereditarianism. Every intelligence textbook emphasizes that no one knows the cause of group gaps, and the only 2 surveys of the topic show substantial numbers of hereditarians among experts. The pure enviro view is much less common.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I read the SEP article now. It's not really anything amazing, generally repeats Lewontin stuff. It also makes claims about consensus about some things, but presents no survey evidence. It does not at all engage with empirical evidence on GxE or GxG of which there is plenty.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't like literature based expressions because these are sensitive to social desirability bias, whereas anonymous surveys are not so much. I think one should follow the approach used in climate science to gauge expert opinion on climate change. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change …
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't know what you mean, interpretations of heritability. This is not like quantum mechanics interpretations. Heritability only has one meaning that everybody uses (G/P var). There are various disagrees on what one can infer from heritability wrt. malleability.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Rindermann's team is planning more surveys, I think maybe later this year or next year. Then they will hopefully be done every 2 years of ISIR, so we can track changes in expert opinion. Will be very informative I hope. :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.