But there is no consensus against race and IQ hereditarianism. Every intelligence textbook emphasizes that no one knows the cause of group gaps, and the only 2 surveys of the topic show substantial numbers of hereditarians among experts. The pure enviro view is much less common.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
I don't know what you mean, interpretations of heritability. This is not like quantum mechanics interpretations. Heritability only has one meaning that everybody uses (G/P var). There are various disagrees on what one can infer from heritability wrt. malleability.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Obviously, researchers think heritability is meaningful, otherwise they wouldn't bother with all the studies. The philosophers are out of touch with the science. Note that philosophers are very left-wing so we can expect them to dislike heritability for political reasons alone.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 7 more replies
-
-
-
Rindermann's team is planning more surveys, I think maybe later this year or next year. Then they will hopefully be done every 2 years of ISIR, so we can track changes in expert opinion. Will be very informative I hope. :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.