Ok, then we seem a lot closer than before. :) However, you seem to have a weird combination of beliefs where you argue against race science as likely having bad consequences, but then admit you don't understand the topics well enough? Are you relying on some authority here or?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
I don't like literature based expressions because these are sensitive to social desirability bias, whereas anonymous surveys are not so much. I think one should follow the approach used in climate science to gauge expert opinion on climate change. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't know what you mean, interpretations of heritability. This is not like quantum mechanics interpretations. Heritability only has one meaning that everybody uses (G/P var). There are various disagrees on what one can infer from heritability wrt. malleability.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Obviously, researchers think heritability is meaningful, otherwise they wouldn't bother with all the studies. The philosophers are out of touch with the science. Note that philosophers are very left-wing so we can expect them to dislike heritability for political reasons alone.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 7 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.