Weird, I wonder why he did that. Kind of weird to see a "free speech" type afraid of their own words.
-
-
Replying to @rasmansa @C_Kavanagh and
Tweets not always deleted for regret, but can be done to avoid future use against oneself (offense archaeology). Some people use tools that delete every tweet more than 14 days old for instance.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @C_Kavanagh and
It's a little weird to be afraid of one's own words, but okay. I thought he was being rude, but nothing to be worried about future Twitter archaeologists seeing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rasmansa @KirkegaardEmil and
14 days won't cut it now with archive and screen shots. Best to think hard before tweeting.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SkepticReview89 @rasmansa and
Most people don't bother to screenshot or archive stuff, so deleting old ('old') tweets is usually enough if one isn't a high profile target (like a politician) where people archive everything at once.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @rasmansa and
I did look over the Murderist argument you sent. It is long and wandering, but what you are basically saying is we are assuming you are "racist by motive." I don't know enuf about it to refute, but I see the issue at least.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SkepticReview89 @KirkegaardEmil and
Your tweet on Black Americans not knowing who the president is tho--I mean, that's just not even remotely related to your research. So, maybe you do need to take a look at all this and think about it. That's just not right, Emil. There's really no getting around it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SkepticReview89 @rasmansa and
I don't recall the context of the tweet. But if you look at surveys of political ignorance, then rates are high all around. I was able to find a survey now of that specific claim and it was wrong (everybody basically knew who Trump was). So what?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @rasmansa and
Much of your research shows a near obsession with race, particularly black vs. white, when I can't even see a purpose. Your study on biracial children in Japan you even state yourself is a pitifully low sample to mean anything.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @SkepticReview89 @KirkegaardEmil and
Yes, you decide to further divide this nonsignificant sample into those with white or black fathers? To what end? I find you to be little more than a hobbyist masquerading as a scientist who is clearly obsessed with IQ and trying to prove whites are superior thru pathetic means.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
You seem not to understand the study design. The very point of this design, as cited by environmentalists all the time, is to figure out causation by this split. You need to read up on the science before trying to apply your motive analysis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyferth_study …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.