Ok, then we seem a lot closer than before. :) However, you seem to have a weird combination of beliefs where you argue against race science as likely having bad consequences, but then admit you don't understand the topics well enough? Are you relying on some authority here or?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Missing heritability (there are several one can define) is not really a philosophical issue, but an expected empirical issue. It's much easier to estimate broad heritability than finding the specific genetic variants that predict, and even more difficult, cause the variation.
I think what the field of philosophy here really needs is for a person with dual expertise to enter the game. There are very few working behavioral geneticists who also have read deeply in the phil literature, and who want to write phil on the topic. Polymaths are very rare.
