Private schools don't really matter much. There is evidence on this too. It's mostly genetic self-selection. Would you have suppressed this evidence too? You seem committed to a general view where suppressing research that disagrees with your current views is the right way.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I also don't understand why you are so interested in assigning works by consensus of belief (usually, there is no consensus on some matter). Why should a prof. do that instead of making his own choices about best worth? Seems your approach will result in stagnation.
I mean in situations where consensus is X, but actually not-X, and everybody keeps being fed material that supports X, not properly engaging at length with the evidence for non-X because not consensus. Seems better to let profs. assign more freely to get some diversity in thought
