Private schools don't really matter much. There is evidence on this too. It's mostly genetic self-selection. Would you have suppressed this evidence too? You seem committed to a general view where suppressing research that disagrees with your current views is the right way.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Ok, then we seem a lot closer than before. :) However, you seem to have a weird combination of beliefs where you argue against race science as likely having bad consequences, but then admit you don't understand the topics well enough? Are you relying on some authority here or?
I also don't understand why you are so interested in assigning works by consensus of belief (usually, there is no consensus on some matter). Why should a prof. do that instead of making his own choices about best worth? Seems your approach will result in stagnation.
-
-
I mean in situations where consensus is X, but actually not-X, and everybody keeps being fed material that supports X, not properly engaging at length with the evidence for non-X because not consensus. Seems better to let profs. assign more freely to get some diversity in thought
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.