He clearly states that if moderates don't speak honestly on this, then right-wing talk radio and websites, among others, will monopolize it to their benefit. This ground is covered in the thread.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You have things backwards. One has to look at the evidence first, and then decide policy. We can't suppress research based on how one imagine it might cause policy changes if you aren't 100% sure these policies are right to begin with. No one has 100% certainty of anything.
As for educational funding, there is ample evidence it doesn't do a whole lot, but it sure costs a lot of money. Seemingly, you are committed to a policy of suppression of research that finds educational interventions doesn't work because you currently believe they work.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 19 more replies
-
-
-
With your approach, one can get locked into beliefs that are false, and we have evidence against, but which is being suppressed. This is why one should not suppress research findings based on outcome based on predicted consequences. It's begging the question indirectly basically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.