It's not tiny and yes.https://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/1020801742584385536?s=19 …
-
2012 was 7 years ago. I had a blog back then too. I also wasn’t a published researcher then and yet I don’t recall every accidentally posting a justification for child rape. People can change, sure, but previous stances tell you about people’s thought processes.
Why the need to keep lying? I never "posting a justification for child rape". How badly do you have to hate someone's research to lie about them in order to try to persuade others from reading their work.
-
-
@C_Kavanagh I say if Emil wants to walk those comments back he should be allowed and we should be receptive. It's a rare enough on here as is. He's got more than enough other things he should walk back. -
He can & should walk them back. He posted a blog that pondered whether drugging and raping a child constituted harm. What I see though is not refutation but rather deflection: it was a thought experiment, it’s old content, I don’t think it’s important, was found by stalker, etc.
-
It's progress, I guess
Maybe at some point he'll walk back the racism stuff too, or at least promote it to just a thought experiment 
https://twitter.com/dbweissman/status/1127360415699218440?s=21 …
-
Hey, Mansa, by the way, this is the first time you and I haven't gotten into a big ol' fight! Progress everywhere.
-
I didn't think we fought that much. I disagree with people on here all the time, but there's always room for agreement
-
Well, my idea of fighting is me getting huffy and closing my computer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.