A TL;DR on why naive falsificationism is not really sensible, despite scientists invoking it all the time. Or one might say, a really TL;DR version of Duhem–Quine thesis without mentioning it. https://necpluribusimpar.net/why-falsificationism-is-false/ … https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duhem%E2%80%93Quine_thesis … https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/W.-V.-Quine-J.-S.-Ullian-The-Web-of-Belief.pdf …
0 replies
4 retweets
15 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.