"serious flaws exist in the methodology and reporting of the original study" How nice of the editors to go on not elaborating what the flaws in the methodology are.
Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition journal cucks and retracts paper showing low IQs in South African colored women. Authors clearly tried to spin it in a nice way, but didn't save them. Fortunately, Sci-Hub has us covered. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13825585.2019.1598538 … http://sci-hub.tw/10.1080/13825585.2019.1598538 …pic.twitter.com/5QmQQiQmGP
-
-
-
The flaw is that the IQs of coloreds was below average.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems like these are findings that anyone involved in designing social policy in South Africa would need to know. Retracting the paper won’t make the findings untrue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And then you discover that there are still people out there who think that the institution of science is about bold and heroic objective truth seeking...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did they remember to apply a correction factor to offset the epigenetic impact of intercontinental Jim Crow?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.