https://scite.ai/reports/influence-of-life-stress-on-Aw29ME?page=1 … can see some contradicting cites at scite.
tfw get 8600 citations in ~15 years for fake finding. Mainstream science guys.pic.twitter.com/8Ep94tk9Q1
-
-
-
Cool site! :) As far as the indicator goes, one might think this was a mostly supported finding, whereas, it's not real at all, as Scott also concluded.pic.twitter.com/mQAparA0PK
-
We don't make a judgement ourselves, just expose the different classifications to users. What I can say is that is a lot of contradicting cites compared to many other studies. (Classifications are also not perfect).
-
The break down of all cites from our analysis is ~95% mentioning, ~5% supporting, and ~1% contradicting. Lots of bias in the literature, we shine a light on it.
-
Yeah, I think it's a good progress. Within a few years, all papers everywhere will be read by highly accurate ML bots and classified, all data extracted, statchecks run automatically etc. Basically, they will enable massive, near real-time meta-science. Will be great!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
If it gets your down maybe try some St. John's Wort.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.