The people who say this, generally have no trouble raising concerns about group inequality though. That's fine, but it means researchers have to investigate causation.
Yeah, why would you Noah? Noah's total papers towards this end has reached an astonishing level of n = 0 so far, clearly revealing his very secret politics.https://twitter.com/DeiviAccounts/status/1125738133281230848 …
-
-
-
@saletan has tried to point this out. If people want to complain about group disparities then they can't complain about researchers investigatating causation.#NoahCarlhttps://slate.com/technology/2009/04/the-perils-of-analyzing-test-scores-by-race.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The frame is way off so it's hard to know where to start from. It's crucial for scientific progress that autonomous researchers can pursue a wide range of questions. Research & policy are 2 distinct spheres; politics itself shouldn't be based on avg differences.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
You can't be an apolitical truth seeker in academia today, but communism? No problem!https://twitter.com/DeiviAccounts/status/1125814602955153414?s=19 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When someone uses positivism as an argument you know they are too far gone, and can’t sort out fact and value.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.