Emil O W Kirkegaard

But those are not Noah Carl's papers, those are mine.

Hah, My bad, I kept seeing references to that one. So you're one of the authors and he reviewed it? Either way, it's associated with him since he reviewed it and lists it on his page.

Emil Kirkegaard is one of the folks condemned in the New Statesman piece and I commend him for attempting a conversation on this issue, even in the face of that awful troll who suggested he jack off to pictures of the Holocaust.

Kirkegaard and OpenPsych is the hill you want to die on, then? And you want to talk about credibility, lol.

I mean, you're claiming the guy is a nazi who gets off on the holocaust... Where's your and the movement you represnt's credibility here?

I never said he was a "Nazi," I was being hyperbolic about that, but my point was very valid -- it's idiotic to say there's no "empirical" evidence if "science" codifies societal recognition that one race is smarter than another, that no one is going to do anything bad with that.

That's what Carl wrote and it's fucking idiotic. People have committed genocide for far less -- for nothing. Science and data, purportedly, hold some gravitas in our society. People pushing this stupid bullshit have no need to study the problems surrounding this

The genocide you referenced, the holocaust, was for precisely the opposite reason; the jews were far more educated and wealthy than the population at large. That doesn't support your claim at all.