Yeah sure but not everyone is Galileo. There is even a logical fallacy named after it. I’m with Carl Sagan in that ‘extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence’. In any case we probably both agree that you should have strong evidence if you want to make a strong claim.
-
There are multiple "problematic" papers, but the thesis I've seen most often cited as controversial is the association between national IQ/home country Muslim %age with crime. It hits the twin buttons of Islamophobia and scientific racism in one paper.
-
-
Hah, My bad, I kept seeing references to that one. So you're one of the authors and he reviewed it? Either way, it's associated with him since he reviewed it and lists it on his page.
-
The whole thing is tied up in guilt by association. He published and supported openpsych and openpsych published papers referencing "National IQ" and crime. A lot of people immediately categorize that as scientific racism
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.