One of the best criticisms of an article in @Quillette I have yet seen. On the (de)merits of the content (credibly argued as flawed and possibly biased, with evidence, not insult). This is how intellectual criticism should be done.http://ow.ly/5dJw50tSPS8
-
Obvious from quickly looking at the figure. n = 80 into many subcategories, and weird parallel lines.
Pretty sure these lines are just because these are the model predictions, not the empirical summary statistics. A model without interactions produces exactly parallel lines like this. This is the same as the stuff that @ZachG932 normally posts (when he doesn't add interactions).
-
-
Yes. There is just not enough data to make the model really. So they shouldn't have tried.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.