Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
KirkegaardEmil's profile
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
@KirkegaardEmil

Tweets

Emil O W Kirkegaard

@KirkegaardEmil

#psychology #genomics #hbd #rstats #statistics #genomics #transhumanism #dataviz #openscience #psychometrics @OpenPsychJour

Denmark
emilkirkegaard.dk
Joined January 2012

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Lee Jussim‏ @PsychRabble May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @PsychRabble @NeilKenny0 and

      You were right about one thing. I could dismiss most of your arguments. I just did. They were terrible arguments. What's left is guilt by association and even that is far murkier than the accusations let on. END.

      1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
    2. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @PsychRabble @NeilKenny0 and

      lol. OK Lee, a lot to get to but let me start where you finish. Of course, you can dismiss most (not all?) of my arguments. At this stage, I would say the chance of you revising your assessment is close to 0. That's fine but I don’t think restating your conclusion ...

      1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
    3. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

      ...that you are correct is that productive. I know you think you are right. So should anyone who follows you. Declaring yourself victorious and your opponents to have weak unconvincing arguments is not that difficult when you are the arbiter. The conversation might go smoother...

      1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes
    4. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

      ... with less editorialising about how you have dismissed my arguments. This isn't a Ben Shapiro youtube video. I would hope it is a discussion between two people who respect each other but disagree and are presenting their arguments. That's just a request, up to you if you heed.

      1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes
    5. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

      On your points... Again, if you charitably interpret every single point in isolation I agree that you can easily find no fault. This is what I am charging you of doing. Where others see obvious malfeasance you see pure scholarly interest. I won't be ever able to demonstrate...

      1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
    6. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

      ... to a level you would accept that you are displaying confirmation bias. You can always assert and provide select illustrations to demonstrate how your bias is simply an accurate model of reality. The problem is that your opponents claim the exact same thing. Their models...

      1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes
    7. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

      ... can be supported by selected examples too. So my only request would be for you to critically examine whether there is ANYTHING about this event that has failed to confirm your negative impressions of liberal academics & positive impressions about consv./heterdox academics...

      2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
    8. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

      ... I suspect I already know your answer and, if that were me, it would create pause for thought. I think my model of the world is generally accurate but when an event confirms all of the worst stereotypes I hold about a group I dislike & all the best about a group I like: 🧐.

      2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
    9. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

      Alright, I'll try to be brief for the rest... 1. I never said someone should be fired for discussing eugenics. I do think people advocating it *tend* to have dubious motives but whatever. (PS: I didn't even say I agree with Carl being fired).

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    10. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

      2. On Carl’s attendance at the Intelligence ‘conference’, I didn’t mention it but it was another questionable choice. The conference seems like a dubious event for various fringe theorists. Here is how Toby Young described it 👇.pic.twitter.com/qfwYOsPr1J

      2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
      Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil May 3
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

      There is a peer-reviewed correspondence in the journal Intelligence dealing with criticisms of the London Conference: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300837 …

      10:13 PM - 3 May 2019
      • 3 Likes
      • Argos Skeptic Review Prof V
      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @PsychRabble and

          Yes I’ve read it and wasn’t surprised by the content.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil May 3
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @C_Kavanagh @PsychRabble and

          From the correspondence: "The attendees had a range of theoretical orientations and research interests, and their attendance does not imply agreement with the views of all of the other attendees, be they political, moral or scientific"

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        4. Chris Kavanagh‏ @C_Kavanagh May 3
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @PsychRabble and

          Right, I wonder if you get the same kind of statement at historical revisionism conferences too? I don’t think I’ve said anywhere attendance equates to endorsing the worst form of eugenics. I said it’s a questionable decision for an academic. I stand by that.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. 3 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info