A Panofsky and the realities of scientific racism maybe getting better #AAPA2019pic.twitter.com/rbxJcTD1I6
-
Fairly sure that is not Crick. He wasn’t known for espousing prejudiced views.
You mean well-evidenced. Anyway, he did hold them, but perhaps the slideshow attacker doesn't know.http://www.unz.com/isteve/francis-crick-james-watsons-partner-was/ …
-
-
1) Crick was known to favor what he called "positive eugenics", where smart or wealthy people are given incentives to have more kids but no one is coerced to do anything one way or the other. Which still isn't good. But I'd hardly call him racist, or ...
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.