Some deny the IQ gap and put it down to “ethnic networking” I’ve argued with a few of these knuckleheads, and they get mad when you bring up chess as a network-proof control example. They say only rich kids have time to master chess, which I guess counts as an enviro argument.
If we limit ourselves to White Nationalist writers, does anyone know of any (quasi-) academic/scholarly writings (blogs etc.) on Jewish intelligence that either 1) denies the phenotypic IQ advantage, or 2) asserts it has environmental causes?
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
Have you looked at The Occidental Quarterly? It might have something like that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
closest I've seen is twitter white nationalists downplaying it. how many openly white nationalist people write on these topics anyway?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
My guess is the total numbers of right wing anti-semites probably much less than left wing anti-semites even ignoring muslims. The RWAS make a lot of noise but aren’t typically “scholarly,” I’d estimate the base they are selling to mostly IQ<90 whites sprinkled thru hinterlands.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ron Unz denies a Jewish IQ advantage, and a number of WNs endorse his theory (e.g., David Duke).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They obviously have higher IQs. They’re just naturally tribal in the realm of politics. Much like the Chinese buying influence in Hollywood.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've never sern WNs outright deny the gap, but they usually favor other explanations (nepotism) when explaining jewish overrepresentation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe
@Sean84076698@AnatomicallyOK@JFGariepy know of one. I have not seen any that deny the former. Most acknowledge the latter but believe it plays a small role. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
WNs aren't interested in fooling themselves. The problem is the 'elite' pretension: that Ashkenazis only average higher when our working class is included for the overall average. Our own elite are smarter. So as an 'elite' Ashkenazis aren't attractive. Just aggressive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Charles Murray at AEI cites a range of 107-115 with 110 being the acceptable compromise for an average. If 115 were indeed accurate that would be one full standard deviation above whites. Lynn (2004) calculated one-half standard deviation. Cochran
http://web.mit.edu/fustflum/documents/papers/AshkenaziIQ.jbiosocsci.pdf … -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Kirkegaard cites Lynn (2011) calculating 109-115 in the January education study comparing Jewish GCA to Catholics and Lutherans.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601752_Polygenic_Scores_Mediate_the_Jewish_Phenotypic_Advantage_in_Educational_Attainment_and_Cognitive_Ability_Compared_With_Catholics_and_Lutherans …
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.