It is possible to know, like this. There's not a big difference but cons slightly more informed. http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=6761
Sure does seem to be about me. Some guy called Rep Sci something goes around on Twitter doing the moralizing thing about said person. This makes no sense unless you assume some Unthinkable level of moral depravity. So far, we've got to false claim of pedophile apologist. Next up?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replicable, I am muting you; will prob unmute in a few weeks. You are trying, and failing to stigmatize/denounce, lots of attempts at guilt-by-association; that you cite rationalwiki as evid of anything shoots your cred w/me to 0. 1/n
-
Altho I am not saying this, let's stipulate, for this discussion, that Emil is EVIL INCARNATE. It is then very much a personal decision whether anyone wants to engage with EVIL. Some do. Not your place to tell anyone who to engage with. https://www.npr.org/2017/08/20/544861933/how-one-man-convinced-200-ku-klux-klan-members-to-give-up-their-robes … 2/n
-
You have freedom to denounce anyone you like, to try to work up an outrage mob, to play guilt-by-assoc to your heart's content. I, however, am not interested in hearing it, thus the mute. Bye for now. Maybe I'll hear from you again in a month or three. End.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.