Perhaps we should renames IQ as a ‘general human capability score that is not remotely close to anything we call intelligence, but yet correlates really well with everything we call intelligence’. Suddenly everyone would be pouring money into IQ research.
Thou shall not cite Richard Lynn http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=7746
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the World Bank has very recently jumped on the "human capital" measuring bandwagon too, without mentioning That-Which-Must-Not-Be-Named https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30498 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not citing crappy research is probably a good thing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
"....or Heiner Rindermann, or David Becker, or Gerhard Meisenberg" So Rushton is still good?
-
Rushton didn't do any national IQ data gathering.
-
Then I'll assume Vanhanen is also defunct by association.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.