My most positive take is that scientists knew all along these "we've now got 7 SNPs for trait T" were useless, but they propped them up to give funders something to see until larger samples could be gathered and actually useful results. They were rationally biting their time.
-
-
Show this thread
-
But my pessimist take is that probably Turkheimer is right. These scientists were pretty delusional about the utility of these early GWASs. Animal researchers didn't give a fuck about significant hits or functional analysis, they just wanted validity, and they did much better.
Show this thread -
See,
@ent3c, we can agree on something once in a while. ;)Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.