Investigation by @jonatanpallesen
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ideological p-hacking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This blog selectively picks only the first half of the analyses the authors performed, then acts as if this is the totality of the paper's original evidence and that the authors were not aware of these preliminary issues. This is not how sincere scientific critique is conducted.
-
What do you think is good evidence in the paper that I don't address? There are some more tables in the rest of the paper, but I see p-values like 0.106 and 0.756.
-
I do not think the paper has strong evidence. But the authors do not claim to have strong evidence. They openly acknowledge their empirical shortcomings, the complexities of the analyses, and narrowness of the results. The blog, conversely, paints a crude and simple picture.
-
It begins with an utterly irrelevant example, quickly shifts to cherry picked statistics, selectively critiques those cherry picked stats, then concludes with an absolute condemnation. It could not have more completely ignored the substance of the original article...
-
I did not "cherry pick" anything. I went through all the major reported results in the paper. None of them give good evidence for the claim about gender discrimination that the study has been claimed to support. Thus, I write this in the conclusion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How about the other famous study about African names on resumes? (Claiming African names hurt job seekers)
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Same study showed no discrimination against women in callbacks. Other studies show statistical discrimination even by black employers against young inner city men, but not against black women or older age black men
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
Wow! I've repeated this story a dozen times, never once imagining that it was as fake as all the other grievance hoaxes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And yet, only 11 claps. Tough to persuade the “narrators”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Mislim, sociologinje, pozor! Ženske STE DISKRIMINIRANE in to tako, da človeku kar sapo jemlje!
#sexual_utopia_is_a_real_thing#omni_out_of_kitchen_affirmative_action#faculty_of_trusted_flaggershttps://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/1098015146079866881 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are orchestras for profit firms? Known from alchian and Kessel that firms not subject to competitive and profit maximising disciplines indulge prejudicespic.twitter.com/W2JPfW5AVA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I heard about that on NPR years ago. Was just a lie, huh?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.