Somehow never saw this study before. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379414000973 …pic.twitter.com/3Pg0IQFbQv
-
This study has been criticized on the ground that the conclusion was probably explained by measurement error though.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/26/upshot/illegal-voting-claims-and-why-they-dont-hold-up.html …
Without knowing anything about the study, I would expect there to be 10 unfair criticisms of it already. Even if the original was pristine in quality. This kind of finding is very counter-narrative so must be attacked on method grounds, good or not.
-
-
I agree that regardless of the quality of the study, it would have been attacked because its conclusion is unpalatable, but as it happens I think the criticism is justified.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.