Reading a 22-page article based entirely on the author's assumption that correlation = causation. #phdlife #phdchatpic.twitter.com/2MiPOyFYBz
Show this thread
-
-
New in the sense that I hadn't read it before. Old in the sense that it was published in 2010.
-
It's quite dumb but I don't think there's any published criticism of it. I don't know any at least.
-
I couldn't find any, either. It is a veru stupid article, but it's 9 years too late to submit a manuscript to the journal contesting the claims.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.