this had a n=32, and none of the usual suspects played gotchahttps://twitter.com/whyvert/status/1092127823987388422 …
Using less than.... n=52 is definitely a sure sign of a pseudoscientist! No one reputable would conclude something about an entire population based on less.... aaaah! 
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2018/04/21/a-group-of-people-with-an-amphibious-life-have-evolved-traits-to-match?fsrc=scn/fb/te/bl/ed/agroupofpeoplewithanamphibiouslifehaveevolvedtraitstomatchhumanevolution …
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(18)30386-6#secsectitle0020 …pic.twitter.com/N0wMjMG2jV
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
let it go
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.