>calling people names instead of arguing with data
>trying to overturn empirical data with "what if" theoretical models
>thinking this is how science works
I think you need more years in that PhD program, bro. Slow learner, but if you spend 10000 hours on it, you'll make it.
https://twitter.com/itsbirdemic/status/1081697293991059456 …
-
@itsbirdemic you guys should resolve whatever disagreement you have with a bet Bryan Caplan/Robin Hanson style, agree to time tables, terms & the type of evidence you need to properly conclude it etc. If you think your position is that solid might as well make some $$$. Thoughts?
I'm happy to but Kevin doesn't believe in data for this question so one can't really do a bet. I'm happy to take a public bet for eg 5k USD on whether causal variant polygenic scores will show alignment with phenotypic gaps for IQ eg in 3 years time.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'll allow him to work it out off at same hourly salary as he gets now.
End of conversation
-
-
-
That sounds vague. Quantitatively speaking what do you mean by “closing the gap”?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wth you talking about lol.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.