>calling people names instead of arguing with data
>trying to overturn empirical data with "what if" theoretical models
>thinking this is how science works
I think you need more years in that PhD program, bro. Slow learner, but if you spend 10000 hours on it, you'll make it.
https://twitter.com/itsbirdemic/status/1081697293991059456 …
-
Oh it’s not really that impressive, that’s why it’s laughable you haven’t even done that much
-
-
It takes a very special kind of person to show off their paper with 38 citations while knowing that every single one of those was a self-citation.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah, he explained it one tweet above mine.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
There's two simple measures of self citations. One of them is proportion of citations going to self, the other is proportion of citations that are from self. I think the first is problematic (see Robert Sternberg affair) and the latter is not (indicates working in small area).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
kevin is hotter than u
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kevin’s publications look way cooler than yours
-
C'mon fellas, the flexing going on in this thread appears estrogen-fueled.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo9m2XhVmv8 … - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Emil, sweetie, have you thought about taking a genetics class?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I concede that I am not as adept at egregious self-citation
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That one 'the g factor' ? Do you have any other useless research?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.