The three experts she cites in her new article that I’ve heard of are Reich Collins and Plomin and none denies that there are innate group differences in intelligence
I guess these kinds of hit pieces are nothing new to this Army Harmon. Here's one from 2007 in similar style: ignore actual data, get quotes from people who appear to be authoritative on topic (but who aren't) and who say what you want to hear. End. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html …pic.twitter.com/falsWu6O6p
-
-
-
Reich left the door open and wrote a NYT piece to advice geneticists etc. not to be so cocky. She cites him just for that one statement about stereotypes, which I think he put for self-defense reasons. Reich knows that many historical facts have been validated by genetics.
-
Plomin avoids the topic and has not done any research on group differences. Plomin spent most of his time pushing individual differences behavioral genetics. Good career move, and good for science, but cowardly (as Plomin himself says).
-
Collins is an irrelevant person. He was head of human genome project but is not a behavioral geneticist or IQ researcher or population geneticist. He's mostly interested in medical stuff, I think, that and trying to prove God exists, lol.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What this idiot was trying to say was that people are trying to correlate data with everyday reality, this being that history, culture and life in general confirm with near total confluence that there is a clear racial heirarchy in intelligence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.