Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07748-z … But there's tons of these papers, I made a small collection here: http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=7632
Show this thread
No serious researcher would study group differences in humans, right? It's all pseudoscience, NYT journo says so. Maybe tell these Latin America researchers. They sued admixture analysis in large sample to study influence of ancestry (i.e. genetic race) on 28 physical traits.pic.twitter.com/k00O4fhEQA
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@lieberman_jason In my experience, I've never met ANYONE with a genuine interest or involvement in the field of psychology that isn't fascinated by the idea of individual/group differences among humans. They may frame their interest differently than that...but it's always there.pic.twitter.com/e0FMzldbml
-
The king of measurement!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.