Probably a lot of the sex diff in availability is market dynamics. Basically there is a queue of men interested in casual sex that never fully empties itself. That can create the sort of orders of magnitudes diff in eg received messages even with more modest trait diffs.
-
Makes sense. Dating sites effectively have the same dynamic as polygamous societies
Dating apps allow high tier men network access to nearly unlimited supply of women okay with short term relations. As a result, they cause high male mating success variance, and probably help destabilize pair bonding in general. Freedom leads to worse outcome for all? Perhaps.
-
-
Don't know how unlimited the supply is as there are more than twice as many men on tinder than women. Not close to Ashley Madison numbers but still a skew https://www.statista.com/statistics/607430/tinder-gender-distribution-usa/ …
-
The ratio doesn't matter because the low tier men almost never get girl swipes. All that matters is the absolute number of girls is high (practically inexhaustible), and of course, new girls reach the age of consent every day.
-
Sure, but I the rumours of tinder as the great hook-up facilitator are a bit overstretched. It's nothing like grindr, many use it to seek long term relationships or only as an ego booster.
-
Sounds like you should try joining some of the PUA groups and watch the pros.
-
Clubs are better, especially if you know the right venues
-
I know the old school pickup artists advised against dating sites because you have to start the routine over again in real life, they preferred clubs
-
Even better, you can select the audience
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.