The latest in guilt by association without any actual scientific criticism. Business as usual in this field. I don't mind too much because reasonable people will check the primary sources and come to their own conclusions.https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/education/2018/12/no-objecting-cambridge-s-appointment-eugenicist-not-about-free-speech …
-
When they use the term "inflammatory" they mean you're threatening their taboos and they are enflamed by that
The study actually never looked at race. These were all national origin groups which is not quite the same as racial groups, in some cases far from it. Not that there's anything wrong with racial stereotype research, just this wasn't that.