By my last count, 16% (33/208) of the tweets referencing this preprint from @apragsdale and @SFGravel have come from accounts pushing "race realism," "human biodiversity," or other alt-right propaganda.https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/12/07/489401 …
-
i don't "signal boost" anybody. i rt what i find interesting. i even rt YOU sometimes! =P (oh. and
@Steve_Sailer's not a white supremacist, btw. he's a citizenist. dunno about@KirkegaardEmil.)
I don't really think it's a useful term, for broadly the analogous reasons that Scott outlines here for the racism term.http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/06/21/against-murderism/ …
-
-
scott (
@slatestarcodex) has blocked "human biodiversity" and "hbd" in the comments on his blog, so i don't bother reading it since i can't take part in the discussion there. not using my preferred pseudonym, anyway. (~_^) -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
oh, i'm not taking personally or anything. think it's silly, tho. but, whatevs.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
i interact with whoever tweets to me (as long as they don't advocate violence). i'm interacting with you now! (~_^) as i've told others b4, i've almost never interacted with clare. she left one comment on my blog once. neither are WSs, afaik. and anyway: guilt by assoc? really?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Emil you never answered my question about why exactly you seek to inject the nonscientific concept of "race" into biology.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.