Here is our editorial condemning the open letter signed by 300 academics attempting to pressure @Cambridge_Uni into rescinding the appointment of Dr Noah Carl. With additional remarks from Peter Singer, Cass Sunstein, Jon Haidt, & Jeffrey Flier.https://quillette.com/2018/12/07/academics-mobbing-of-a-young-scholar-must-be-denounced/ …
-
-
Replying to @clairlemon @Cambridge_Uni
a very good article and suitably highlights the Emotion versus Fact debate.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Expect Quillette omitted several key facts. Noah Carl's work is not peer reviewed. It was published in Open Psych which is a pseudo-scientific journal that even had white nationalists as reviewers. So much for emotion versus fact, eh?
6 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @GarettJones @BoydaDavid and
None of this negates the fact signatories are referring to the journals printed in the pseudojournal OpenPsych.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GarettJones @BoydaDavid and
Yeah. But nobody is trying to claim your ideas on Twitter are peer reviewed. Whereas Quillette is ignoring the fact Noah's work (the work in question) is not peer reviewed. Get it?
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
If only the journal website showed the review status, oh right, it does. Reviewed by 2 profs and myself. https://openpsych.net/paper/48 pic.twitter.com/OzqVBO7Nwb
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.