Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?
    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
KirkegaardEmil's profile
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
Emil O W Kirkegaard
@KirkegaardEmil

Tweets

Emil O W Kirkegaard

@KirkegaardEmil

#psychology #genomics #hbd #rstats #statistics #genomics #transhumanism #dataviz #openscience #psychometrics @OpenPsychJour

Denmark
emilkirkegaard.dk
Joined January 2012

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list

    Under 100 characters, optional
    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Claire Lehmann‏Verified account @clairlemon 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet

      Here is our editorial condemning the open letter signed by 300 academics attempting to pressure @Cambridge_Uni into rescinding the appointment of Dr Noah Carl. With additional remarks from Peter Singer, Cass Sunstein, Jon Haidt, & Jeffrey Flier.https://quillette.com/2018/12/07/academics-mobbing-of-a-young-scholar-must-be-denounced/ …

      55 replies 532 retweets 1,424 likes
    2. Dr David Boyda‏ @BoydaDavid 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @clairlemon @Cambridge_Uni

      a very good article and suitably highlights the Emotion versus Fact debate.

      2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
    3. Peter Ferguson‏ @Humanisticus 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @BoydaDavid @clairlemon @Cambridge_Uni

      Expect Quillette omitted several key facts. Noah Carl's work is not peer reviewed. It was published in Open Psych which is a pseudo-scientific journal that even had white nationalists as reviewers. So much for emotion versus fact, eh?

      6 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
    4. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @Humanisticus @BoydaDavid and

      All research articles on @OpenPsychJour are peer reviewed. This is easy to know of course because all the reviews are public. https://www.openpsych.net/forum/showthread.php?tid=292 …

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    5. Peter Ferguson‏ @Humanisticus 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @BoydaDavid and

      You don't follow traditional peer review and follow your own methods which are hugely flawed. Therefore it's not peer reviewed.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @Humanisticus @BoydaDavid and

      >You don't follow traditional peer review >Therefore it's not peer reviewed. Obvious non-sequitur is obvious. Better tell Nature etc. that all their peer review innovations are pseudojournals.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    7. Peter Ferguson‏ @Humanisticus 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @BoydaDavid and

      Sorry. Let me rephrase. You don't follow robust peer review standards.

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      Emil O W Kirkegaard‏ @KirkegaardEmil 7 Dec 2018
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @Humanisticus @BoydaDavid and

      The evidence free tweets keeps coming.

      4:09 PM - 7 Dec 2018
      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        1. Chris Smith ^._.^‏ @spy_historian 8 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @Humanisticus and

          Peer reviewing relies on those doing the reviews being, well, expert peers. What are your, Gerhard Meisenberg or Michael A. Woodley of Menie qualifications, which make you credible expert peers in the field of, say, international security?https://openpsych.net/paper/52 

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        2. 3 more replies
        2. New conversation
        1. ThePrussian‏ @ThePrussian1 8 Dec 2018
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @Humanisticus and

          It's a shame.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        2. 11 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info