3. I don’t think disengaging with mainstream researchers is beneficial for scientific inquiry. But doing so doesn’t automatically make Emil and others “pseudoscientists”. Instead of further antagonizing them, we should, for example, ask them to justify their claims & convictions.
-
-
Ask them to disclose source of funding, and so on to give them an opportunity to rationally convince us that they're right. 4. Science denial will be better explained by empirical psychological studies that probe humans’ actual cognitive processes than philosophers’ conjectures.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
5. There's preliminary reason to suspect that controversial research areas are subject to political bias (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000430 …). 6. Competent scientists with training in statistics probably know how to interpret OpenPsych papers. It's doubtful whether they need your "warning".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
7. Libertarianism is compatible with mandatory vaccination and environmental regulations. The freedom to not get vaccinated or to pollute the environment wrongfully imposes harms on others.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @xirui_zhao @KirkegaardEmil
"Boo hoo the cultural bolsheviks are biased against my race realism" is a fringe position indistinguishable from "boo hoo big pharma wants to give autism to everyone using vaccines" or "boo hoo climate change is a Chinese hoax to hurt US". All conspiracy theories, yours is the
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
most repulsive one. There's no reason whatsoever why someone with actual credentials (in either economics, sociology or genetics, nobody is an expert in all three) could not do the same as Emil; "work in a genomics company" and do whatever science they please in their free time.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Somehow your idol just happens to not have the relevant education, makes you think... (PhD students in Denmark actually get pretty nice money so it's not like he couldn't afford it).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And whether others need my warning or not, I don't know. You would think not, but then I see bunch of real academics flowing him and talking to him like he was a peer. Either they are worthless, or more likely, they don't know he's a fraud so warning is in order (and I have
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
thanks after illuminating an unsuspecting, intelligent academic that he is not what he looks like). It's understandable to make the mistake, you don't do a backgroubd check for everyone you interact with. This is the reason he lies about his number of publications and harasses
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Curiously spends days attacking me with various falsehoods (e.g. has no degree, when he knows I do have a degree, not that it matters much), and then accuses me of harassing him. 

Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.