Emil O W Kirkegaard

7. Libertarianism is compatible with mandatory vaccination and environmental regulations. The freedom to not get vaccinated or to pollute the environment wrongfully imposes harms on others.

"Boo hoo the cultural bolsheviks are biased against my race realism" is a fringe position indistinguishable from "boo hoo big pharma wants to give autism to everyone using vaccines" or "boo hoo climate change is a Chinese hoax to hurt US". All conspiracy theories, yours is the

most repulsive one. There's no reason whatsoever why someone with actual credentials (in either economics, sociology or genetics, nobody is an expert in all three) could not do the same as Emil; "work in a genomics company" and do whatever science they please in their free time.

Somehow your idol just happens to not have the relevant education, makes you think... (PhD students in Denmark actually get pretty nice money so it's not like he couldn't afford it).

And whether others need my warning or not, I don't know. You would think not, but then I see bunch of real academics flowing him and talking to him like he was a peer. Either they are worthless, or more likely, they don't know he's a fraud so warning is in order (and I have

thanks after illuminating an unsuspecting, intelligent academic that he is not what he looks like). It's understandable to make the mistake, you don't do a backgroubd check for everyone you interact with. This is the reason he lies about his number of publications and harasses

people who try to expose him. The libertarian free speech warriors already got my account suspended earlier today, which is of course completely ridiculous.

My position is not a fringe conspiracy theory. The paper I mentioned is written by renowned psychologists and published in a prestigious journal and it argues that people have confirmation bias and that social scientists are not much better than laypersons in that respect.