The modus operandi of almost every academic censor is not to use direct censorship -- too obvious! -- but to raise requirements for ideologically inconvenient findings. Usually this is done with some vague reference to the harms that might result if it were to be believed.https://twitter.com/ReicherStephen/status/1069387592209231872 …
-
Show this thread
So when attacked for their de facto soft censorship, they fall back on "but I'm just in defense of high standards/rigorous science". You can watch this over and over in peer review where findings in support of disfavored ideas gets various extra scrutiny (e.g. more reviewers).
6:38 PM - 2 Dec 2018
0 replies
6 retweets
30 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.